Bowling Green
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
124  Rachel Walny FR 20:06
550  Jasmine Redman SR 20:59
555  Mackenzie McMillin JR 20:59
655  Andrea Alt SR 21:08
798  Rebecca Rae SR 21:19
824  Elena Lancioni SO 21:21
905  Rebecca Schott SO 21:27
992  Allison Francis SO 21:34
1,700  Amanda Garlak JR 22:22
National Rank #81 of 339
Great Lakes Region Rank #10 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.1%
Most Likely Finish 9th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.9%
Top 10 in Regional 69.3%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Rachel Walny Jasmine Redman Mackenzie McMillin Andrea Alt Rebecca Rae Elena Lancioni Rebecca Schott Allison Francis Amanda Garlak
D1 Pre-Nationals (Red) 10/17 996 19:56 21:10 21:27 21:06 21:41 21:35 21:30
Mid American Conference Championships 10/31 971 20:20 20:59 20:45 21:02 21:25 21:14 21:21 21:19 22:23
Great Lakes Region Championships 11/13 971 20:07 21:00 21:02 21:01 21:30 21:15 22:05





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.1% 29.3 722 0.0 0.0 0.0
Region Championship 100% 9.7 295 0.2 0.7 3.2 8.4 15.4 23.0 18.5 13.7 8.8 4.3 2.3 1.0 0.4 0.2 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Rachel Walny 43.0% 95.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1
Jasmine Redman 0.1% 202.5
Mackenzie McMillin 0.1% 207.5
Andrea Alt 0.1% 210.5
Rebecca Rae 0.1% 230.5
Elena Lancioni 0.1% 234.5
Rebecca Schott 0.1% 246.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Rachel Walny 15.1 0.2 0.5 1.4 2.1 3.4 3.8 4.7 4.9 4.9 5.4 5.2 4.5 4.7 3.9 4.4 4.6 4.1 3.3 3.7 3.0 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.5
Jasmine Redman 62.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Mackenzie McMillin 62.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2
Andrea Alt 72.9
Rebecca Rae 85.9
Elena Lancioni 88.6
Rebecca Schott 94.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 0.2% 12.5% 0.0 0.1 0.0 4
5 0.7% 2.9% 0.0 0.7 0.0 5
6 3.2% 0.6% 0.0 3.1 0.0 6
7 8.4% 8.4 7
8 15.4% 15.4 8
9 23.0% 23.0 9
10 18.5% 18.5 10
11 13.7% 13.7 11
12 8.8% 8.8 12
13 4.3% 4.3 13
14 2.3% 2.3 14
15 1.0% 1.0 15
16 0.4% 0.4 16
17 0.2% 0.2 17
18 0.0% 0.0 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 0.1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.9 0.0 0.1




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Texas 43.8% 1.0 0.4
Total 0.4
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0